中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》(CSA)收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

中法足球训练模式的思维范式差异与融合之道

Difference of Thinking Paradigms and Integration Paths in Chinese and French Football Training Models

  • 摘要: 从哲学思维范式的视角比较中国和法国的足球训练模式,重点关注机械整体论与有机整体论在训练理念和实践逻辑方面的表现。发现,中国足球训练模式反映了机械整体论的思维特征,包括还原性思维、线性累积和标准化阶段递进,遵循“局部细化—线性累积—最后整合”的路径,适用于青少年训练初期;法国足球训练模式展现出有机整体论的特征,强调整体性思维、涌现性和系统整合,采取“情境优先—整体涌现—非线性适应”的方法,更适合高水平运动员的训练。这两类模式反映出对足球运动在思维范式、认识论、方法论和价值观方面的不同理解。认为,单一训练模式难以满足不同竞技能力的发展需求,因此,未来的训练创新应结合本土文化与国际经验,平衡“技术基础”与“情境对抗”,为培养实战型足球人才提供更加优化的方案。

     

    Abstract: This study compares the football training models in China and France from the perspective of philosophical paradigms, focusing on the manifestations of mechanical holism and organic holism in training concepts and practical logic. It is revealed that the Chinese model reflects the characteristics of mechanical holism, including "reductive thinking", "linear accumulation" and "standardized stage progression", following the path of "local refinement—linear accumulation—final integration", which is particularly suitable for youth training in its early stages. In contrast, the French model exhibits the features of organic holism, emphasizing "holistic thinking", "emergence" and "systematic integration". It adopts the method of "situation priority—holistic emergence—non-linear adaptation", making it more appropriate for training high-level players. These two models reflect the different understandings of football in terms of thinking paradigms, epistemology, methodology and values. The study suggests that a singular training model may not meet the diverse developmental needs of different athletic abilities. Therefore, future training innovations should integrate local culture and international experience and balance "technical foundations" with "situational confrontation", thus to provide more optimized programs for cultivating practical football talents.

     

/

返回文章
返回