中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》(CSA)收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

视频助理裁判毁了足球?基于我国社交媒体的情感与主题分析

Has Video Assistant Referee (VAR) Ruined Football?A Sentiment and Topic Analysis Based on Chinese Social Media

  • 摘要: 使用基于情感词典的情感分析法及LDA主题模型,对卡塔尔世界杯赛期间新浪微博平台上我国球迷关于视频助理裁判(VAR)技术的博文及评论文本进行情感倾向与主题分析。发现:球迷对VAR以中性及负性情感为主,正性情感仅占25.46%;随着赛程推进,VAR相关网络舆论经历了开始及扩散期、高潮期和消散期3个阶段,球迷情感变化相对稳定;“绝对公平与比赛流畅性”“VAR对裁判权力的剥夺”“VAR与比赛操纵”“VAR使用制度的合理性”是球迷最为关注的4个主题。认为:球迷认可VAR对提升判罚公平性的积极作用,但对其损害比赛流畅性、削弱裁判权威、潜在操纵风险及使用制度模糊等问题存在担忧;足球管理机构应完善VAR使用规则,明确介入标准与时间限制,在技术创新与观赛体验之间寻求平衡。

     

    Abstract: This study analyzed Chinese football fans' posts and comments on ‌Video Assistant Referee (VAR) technology from the Sina Weibo platform during the 2022 Qatar World Cup, using an emotion lexicon-based sentiment analysis and the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic model. The findings reveal that fans' sentiments toward VAR were predominantly neutral or negative, with positive emotions accounting for only 25.46%. Online discussions on VAR progressed through three phases of initiation and diffusion, peak, and dissipation, while fans' emotions remained relatively stable. The topic analysis identified four primary concerns: "Absolute Fairness vs. Game Flow", "Deprivation of Referees' Authority by VAR", "VAR and Match Fixing" and "Rationality of VAR Usage Regulations". It is concluded that fans acknowledge VAR's contribution to refereeing fairness but remain concerned about its disruption of game flow, erosion of referees' authority, potential for match manipulation, and ambiguous usage regulations. Football governing bodies should refine VAR protocols, clarify intervention criteria and time limits, and balance technological innovation with the spectator experience.

     

/

返回文章
返回