中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》(CSA)收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

脑机接口应用下运动员神经数据的现实证立、保护困境与规范进路

Realistic Verification, Protection Dilemma and Regulatory Approach of Athletes' Neural Data Under the Application of Brain-Computer Interface

  • 摘要: 脑机接口应用下的运动员神经数据是指涉及运动员大脑结构、活动及其功能相关的定量数据。通过“司法实践—隐私政策”的逻辑分析运动员神经数据的保护困境,其主要存在神经数据保护依据缺失和数据风险隐患的问题。为保证脑机接口的应用在有利于运动员的同时减少数据风险,需要规范面向运动员的脑机接口应用的隐私政策文本:在数据收集层面,明确神经数据的概念,并在技术成熟时采用“生理数据+心理数据”的保护模式;在数据使用层面,应当规定运动员神经数据的使用时限,采取所有数据保留的“固定时限”或者神经数据保留的“相对时限”;在数据共享层面,明确神经数据共享的具体情形和形式,禁止神经数据的商品化;在数据权利层面,落实关涉运动员神经数据的删除权和撤回同意权,并规定神经数据删除后不保留的必要条款。

     

    Abstract: Athletes' neural data under the application of brain-computer interface (BCI) refers to the quantitative data related to the structure, activity and function of athletes' brains. Through the logical analysis of "judicial practice-privacy policy", the protection dilemma of athletes' neural data mainly exists in the lack of basis for neural data protection and data risk hazards. In order to ensure that the application of brain-computer interface is beneficial to athletes while reducing data risks, it is necessary to standardize the privacy policy text of brain-computer interface applications for athletes: At the data collection level, it is to clarify the concept of neural data, and adopt the protection mode of "physiological data + psychological data" when the technology is mature. At the data usage level, there should be a certain usage time limit for athletes' neural data, which can be a "fixed time limit" for retaining all data or a "relative time limit" for retaining neural data. At the data sharing level, it is to clarify the specific circumstances and forms of neural data sharing, and prohibit the commercialization of neural data. Finally, at the data rights level, it is to implement the right to delete and withdraw consent involving athletes' neural data, and stipulate the necessary terms that neural data will not be retained after deletion.

     

/

返回文章
返回