中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》(CSA)收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

运动训练分期理论的序列训练模式:理论阐释与应用实践

Sequential Training Models Within Theory of Periodization Training: Theoretical Elucidation and Practical Applications

  • 摘要: 为阐明共轭分期(CSS)与板块分期(BP)两类序列训练模式的理论基础、机制差异及互补关系,并构建高水平运动员整合应用实践框架,采用文献综述与比较分析,梳理其理论源流、核心机制及与经典分期的结构关联,归纳不同项目与赛历情境下的应用路径。结果显示:CSS以迟发效应(LDTE)与能力—负荷共轭序列化为核心,聚焦明确瓶颈,实施集中负荷与延迟转化以驱动中周期适应跃迁;BP以余波效应(RTE)为组织主轴,依托“积累—转化—实现”实现少数能力序列化组合以提升多峰赛季的时序训练组织效率与负荷—恢复匹配。二者分别回答“峰值何时出现”与“效应维持多久”的时间结构问题,可形成“BP定骨架与节奏、CSS嵌关键窗口定点强化”的整合范式。CSS与BP构成经典分期在中周期层面的两类机制化拓展:赛历越复杂越宜采用BP控结构与节奏,瓶颈越清晰越宜采用CSS促关键突破,协同应用可提升高水平训练分期的科学性与可执行性,由此为中国运动训练分期理论的本土化深入与高水平训练实践提供新的理论框架与方法路径。

     

    Abstract: This study provides the first systematic clarification of the theoretical foundations and mechanistic structure of the sequential training model composed of Conjugate Sequence System (CSS) and Block Periodization (BP), as well as their ontological differences and complementary relationships at the mesocycle level. Based on this analysis, an operational integration strategy for high-performance athletes is proposed. Using a literature review and mechanistic analysis, the conceptual genealogy, key modules, and structural relationships of these two models were systematically examined, and their typical application pathways were synthesized in relation to sport-specific characteristics and competition-calendar complexity. The results indicate that CSS is grounded in the Long-Term Delayed Training Effect (LDTE) and the conjugate sequencing of abilities and training loads. By concentrating loads on clearly identified performance bottlenecks and facilitating delayed transfer, CSS promotes substantial adaptive shifts within a mesocycle. In contrast, BP is organized around the Residual Training Effect (RTE) and employs the "accumulation–transmutation–realization" structure to combine a limited number of abilities in a sequential manner, thereby enhancing temporal training efficiency and load–recovery alignment during multi-peak competitive seasons. Conceptually, the two models address distinct temporal dimensions of training adaptation: CSS emphasizes when peak performance emerges, whereas BP emphasizes how long training effects can be retained. Their integration may thus form a complementary paradigm in which BP establishes the structural framework and rhythm of mesocycle organization, while CSS is embedded within critical adaptive windows to deliver targeted capacity breakthroughs. The findings suggest that CSS and BP represent two mechanistic extensions of classical periodization at the mesocycle level. In practice, the more complex the competition calendar, the more appropriate it is to employ BP to regulate structural organization and timing of peak performance; conversely, the clearer the limiting performance bottleneck, the more suitable CSS becomes for targeted breakthroughs through concentrated loading. Their coordinated application can enhance both the scientific basis and practical operability of high-performance training periodization, hence providing a new theoretical framework and methodological pathway for the further development of periodization theory and elite training practice in China.

     

/

返回文章
返回