中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》(CSA)收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

操纵体育比赛行为刑法规制的比较考察与本土立场

A Comparative Study of Criminal Law Regulation of Match-Fixing and the Domestic Stance

  • 摘要: 操纵体育比赛行为破坏体育伦理生态和公平竞技秩序,确实存在司法介入的需要,但其刑事介入问题在学术界存在相当争议。操纵体育比赛行为,在法益层面上缺乏独立的保护需求,在技术层面缺乏独立的规范意涵,故增设操纵体育比赛罪不具有刑事应罚性与刑事需罚性。应坚持类型化分析思路,在既有刑法规制框架内,运用体系解释路径实现分类精准处遇:对贿赂型操纵行为,适用现行贿赂犯罪加以规制;对赌博型操纵行为,依据诈骗罪予以惩处;对于纯粹型操纵行为,则不宜纳入刑法视野,交由行政监管与行业自律予以应对。

     

    Abstract: The manipulation of sports competitions undermines the ethical ecology of sports and the order of fair competition, and while there is a need for judicial intervention, its criminal intervention remains considerably controversial in academia. The manipulation of sports competitions lacks an independent need for protection at the level of legal interests and lacks independent normative implications at the technical level. Therefore, establishing a separate crime of match-fixing is neither criminally punishable nor necessary. A typological analytical approach should be adopted: within the existing criminal law framework, a systematic interpretation should be employed to achieve precise classification and treatment. Specifically, bribery-type manipulation should be regulated by existing bribery offenses; gambling-type manipulation should be punished under fraud crimes; and pure-type manipulation should not be criminalized but rather left to administrative supervision and industry self-regulation.

     

/

返回文章
返回