中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》(CSA)收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

研究范式转型与中国体育学自主知识体系构建

Transformation of Research Paradigms and the Construction of an Independent Knowledge System for Chinese Sports Studies

  • 摘要: 构建中国体育学自主知识体系是新时代体育学科高质量发展、服务体育强国战略的核心命题。研究范式作为体育学知识生产与理论创新的底层规范,直接决定学科知识建构质量与国际学术话语权。采用文献资料法、历史分析法、比较研究法与逻辑分析法,界定体育学研究范式与自主知识体系的核心内涵,阐释二者耦合共生的内在机理,系统梳理我国体育学研究范式的发展成效与现实短板,剖析新时代研究范式转型的核心趋势、内在逻辑与实践路径。认为,新时代中国体育学需要实现多维度、系统性的研究范式转型,推动研究从西方范式依附转向本土问题原创,从单一分科研究转向跨学科融合,从经验静态阐释转向系统动态实证,从纯理论思辨转向实践应用,从零散建制摸索转向体系化规范完善,从单向知识引进转向双向互鉴的全球对话。中国体育学自主知识体系的构建需要以研究范式转型为基础,贯通知识生产、学术评议、传播扩散、实践应用与反馈迭代等环节,为体育强国建设和全民健身战略提供坚实的学理支撑,助力健康中国建设。

     

    Abstract: Constructing an independent knowledge system for Chinese sports studies constitutes a core proposition for the high-quality development of sports disciplines and the implementation of the sports power strategy in the new era. As the underlying norms governing knowledge production and theoretical innovation in sports studies, research paradigms directly determine the quality of disciplinary knowledge construction and international academic discourse power. Adopting methods of literature review, historical analysis, comparative research and logical analysis, this paper defines the core connotations of research paradigms and the independent knowledge system of sports studies, elaborates their inherently coupled and symbiotic mechanism, systematically reviews achievements and practical deficiencies in the evolution of Chinese sports studies research paradigms, and analyzes the core trends, internal logic and practical approaches of paradigm transformation in the new era. The study concludes that sports studies in China must undergo a multidimensional and systematic transformation of its research paradigms in the new era from dependence on Western paradigms to original theorization rooted in Chinese problems, from discipline-bound research to interdisciplinary integration, from static, experience-based interpretation to systematic and dynamic empirical inquiry, from purely theoretical speculation to practical application, from fragmented institution-building to systematic and standardized development, and from one-way knowledge importation to global dialogue based on two-way exchange and mutual learning. The construction of an independent knowledge system for Chinese sport studies should be grounded in this paradigm transformation and connect the key processes of knowledge production, academic evaluation, knowledge dissemination, practical application, and feedback-based iteration. This will provide solid theoretical support for building China into a leading sporting nation and advancing the National Fitness Strategy and the Healthy China Initiative.

     

/

返回文章
返回