Citation: | TONG Yunfeng. Legal Interest Infringed upon by the Match-fixing in Sports Competitions and Its Criminal Law Protection[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2024, 48(10): 62-72, 96. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2024.04.21.0004 |
The purpose of criminal punishment of the match-fixing in sports is to protect the fairness and authenticity of sports competitions, which is a substantial legal benefit with the basis of constitution and sports law, directly manifested as the right to fair competition and the right to watch the real competition. However, in the current practice, the match-fixing in sports competitions is indirectly regulated by gambling crime and taking bribes by non-state staff. This indirect regulation mode presents such problems as poor protection, lack of system and analogy explanation. In order to protect the fairness and authenticity of sports competitions more comprehensively, directly and systematically, it is necessary to move from explanatory theory to legislative theory. In the previous stage of actual law, the criminal match-fixing should be added to the criminal law in our country, set as an untrue identity offence, consequence offence and legal offence, so as to maintain the punishment limit of criminal law and rationalize the relationship between the criminal law and the pre-law. In the stage of actual law, based on the principles of type, system and clarity of criminal legislation, we should make necessary amendments and explanations to the crime of obstructing doping administration, so that this crime will become a special crime of the match-fixing. In addition, the cross-competition relationship between the two crimes will be clarified.
[1] |
GOKHALE N. Fixing the fixers:The justification of criminal liability for match-fixing[J]. NUJS Law Review,2009,2(2):319-336
|
[2] |
SPAPENS T,OLFERS M. Match-fixing:The current discussion in Europe and the case of the Netherlands[J]. European Journal of Crime,Criminal Law and Criminal Justice,2015,23(4):333-358 doi: 10.1163/15718174-23032077
|
[3] |
为建设体育强国提供有力保障:访全国人大代表、国家体育总局副局长刘国永[N]. 中国体育报,2024-03-11(1
|
[4] |
克劳斯·罗克辛,陈璇. 对批判立法之法益概念的检视[J]. 法学评论,2015,33(1):53-67
|
[5] |
FIELKOW J,WERLY D,SENSI A. Tackling PASPA:The past,present,and future of sports gambling in America[J]. DePaul Law Review,2016,66(1):23-50
|
[6] |
伊东研祐. 法益概念史研究[M]. 秦一禾,译. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2014:29-30
|
[7] |
李斯特. 德国刑法教科书:修订译本[M]. 施密特,修订. 徐久生,译. 北京:法律出版社,2006:6
|
[8] |
林山田. 刑法通论[M]. 台北:元照出版有限公司,2008:93-94
|
[9] |
施特拉腾韦特,库伦. 刑法总论Ⅰ:犯罪论[M]. 杨萌,译. 北京:法律出版社,2006:36
|
[10] |
罗克辛. 德国刑法学总论:第1卷:犯罪原理的基础构造[M]. 王世洲,译. 北京:法律出版社,2005:23
|
[11] |
蓝学友. 规制抽象危险犯的新路径:双层法益与比例原则的融合[J]. 法学研究,2019,41(6):134-149
|
[12] |
黄荣坚. 基础刑法学:上[M]. 4版. 台北:元照出版有限公司,2012:27
|
[13] |
BALSAM J S. Criminalizing match-fixing as America legalizes sports gambling[J]. Marquette Sports Law Review,2020,31(1):1-34
|
[14] |
张明楷. 法益初论[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,2000:94-95
|
[15] |
瓦克斯. 法哲学:价值与事实[M]. 谭宇生,译. 南京:译林出版社,2013:1
|
[16] |
马默. 法哲学[M]. 孙海波,王进,译. 北京:北京大学出版社,2014:88
|
[17] |
MCGORRERY P. The philosophy of criminalisation:A review of Duff et al.'s criminalisation series[J]. Criminal Law and Philosophy,2018,12(1):185-208 doi: 10.1007/s11572-017-9416-y
|
[18] |
张明楷. 刑法分则的解释原理[M]. 2版. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,2011:344-347
|
[19] |
大塚仁. 犯罪论的基本问题[M]. 冯军,译. 北京:中国政法大学出版社,1993:7
|
[20] |
王作富,田宏杰. “黑哨”行为不能以犯罪论处[J]. 政法论坛,2002(3):163-165
|
[21] |
曲新久. “黑哨”行为已构成受贿罪[J]. 政法论坛,2002(3):160-162
|
[22] |
西田典之. 日本刑法各论[M]. 王昭武,刘明祥,译. 北京:法律出版社,2020:223
|
[23] |
潘星丞,陈芹. 假球行为的刑法定性[J]. 体育学刊,2014,21(4):37-41 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7116.2014.04.009
|
[24] |
井厚亮. 足球“黑哨”行为对法益的侵害及其定性[J]. 西安体育学院学报,2011,28(1):18-21 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-747X.2011.01.006
|
[25] |
张奥. 增设操纵体育比赛罪的质疑[J]. 武汉体育学院学报,2021,55(11):50-55 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-520X.2021.11.007
|
[26] |
童云峰,汪焱梁. 运动员生物识别信息双维保护模式之形塑[J]. 上海体育学院学报,2022,46(2):43-55
|
[27] |
童云峰. 个人信息保护法与侵犯公民个人信息罪的衔接机制[J]. 中外法学,2024,36(2):366-385 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4875.2024.02.005
|
[28] |
童云峰,欧阳本祺. 我国教育法法典化之提倡[J]. 国家教育行政学院学报,2021(3):26-34 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-4038.2021.03.005
|
[29] |
陈艳,王霁霞. 德国操纵体育比赛刑法规制研究[J]. 西安体育学院学报,2020,37(6):663-669
|
[30] |
胡萨克. 过罪化及刑法的限制[M]. 姜敏,译. 北京:中国法制出版社,2015:57
|
[31] |
张明楷. 增设新罪的原则:对《刑法修正案十一(草案)》的修改意见[J]. 政法论丛,2020(6):3-16 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6274.2020.06.001
|