中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价（A刊）核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》（CSSCI）来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》（CSA）收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

Volume 42 Issue 6
Nov.  2018
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Abstract
References
Related Articles
GUO Shuli. The Institutional Defects and Reform of the Mechanism of International Arbitration for Sport from the Perspective of the Pechstein Case[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2018, 42(6): 1-10. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2018.06.001
Citation: GUO Shuli. The Institutional Defects and Reform of the Mechanism of International Arbitration for Sport from the Perspective of the Pechstein Case[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2018, 42(6): 1-10. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2018.06.001
shu

The Institutional Defects and Reform of the Mechanism of International Arbitration for Sport from the Perspective of the Pechstein Case

  • 1.

    Kenneth Wang Law School, Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, Jiangsu, China

  • 2.

    Jiangsu Universities and Colleges Collaborative Innovation Center for Regional Development, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, China

More Information
  • Received Date: May 04, 2017
  • Revised Date: October 04, 2018
  • Publish Date: November 29, 2018
  • Issue Publish Date: November 29, 2018
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • The rulings by the Munich local court and the high court in the Pechstein Case called into question of the independence of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS), as well as of the fairness of arbitration procedure. And this challenge will not disappear with the reversed decision by the Germany Supreme Court. CAS must be reformed to keep on its step with the time. That is, the leader of the International Council of Sports (ICAS) and the CAS arbitrators list should have more representatives from the athletes and the independent third parties. The nomination methods of the chairman of the arbitration panel or the sole arbitrator shall be improved. The conditions for the application for the legal aids should be more flexible. The judicial review of the CAS arbitration awards should be reinforced. All the institution design should safeguard the fairness of the international sports arbitration mechanism.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (21)
  • [1]
    DESPINA M, MATTHIEU R.The code of the court of arbitration for sport:Commentary, cases and materials[M].The Hague:Kluwer Law International, 2015:xxxiii
    [2]
    ANTOINE D.The court of arbitration for sport after Pechstein: Reform or revolution?[EB/OL].[2017-01-10].http://www.asser.nl/SportsLaw/Blog/post/the-court-of-arbitration-for-sport-after-pechstein-reform-or-revolution
    [3]
    熊瑛子.国际体育仲裁院仲裁员中立性探讨[J].体育科学, 2015, 35(12):84-85 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tykx201512011
    [4]
    HANSJÖG S, MICHAEL B.Multiple appointments of an arbitrator:Does the Swiss federal supreme court really see no limit?[J].Arbitration Newsletter Switzerland, 2012(11):4 https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/5-502-1047?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)
    [5]
    DESPINA M.The legality of the arbitration agreement in favour of CAS under German civil and competition law: The Pechstein ruling of the German federal tribunal (BGH) of 7 June 2016[EB/OL].[2017-01-10].http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2800044
    [6]
    CHRISTIAN K, NICOLA K.Should doping in sport be criminalised? A review of germany's new anti-doping act[EB/OL].[2017-01-10].http://www.lawinsport.com/articles/item/should-sports-be-criminalising-doping-a-review-of-germany-s-new-anti-doping-act
    [7]
    ANTOINE D.The BGH's Pechstein decision: A surrealist ruling[EB/OL].[2017-01-10].http://www.asser.nl/SportsLaw/Blog/post/the-bgh-s-pechstein-decision-a-surrealist-ruling
    [8]
    ANTONIO R, FABRICE RT."Consent" in sports arbitration, its multiple aspects[C]//Elliott Geisinger & Elena trabaldo-de mestral.Sports arbitration: A coach for other players? ASA Special Series No.41.New York: JurisNet, LLC, 2015: 73
    [9]
    郭树理.国际体育仲裁的理论与实践[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社, 2009:207
    [10]
    郭树理.体育纠纷的多元化救济机制探讨:比较法与国际法的视野[M].北京:法律出版社, 2004:321
    [11]
    DESPINA M.Jurisprudence of the Swiss tribunal in appeals against CAS awards[J].International Sports Law Review, 2011(2):20 http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2573304
    [12]
    陈斌彬.从困局到变局:析PECHTEIN案对国际体育仲裁院的挑战及应对[J].天津体育学院学报, 2015, 30(4):324 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tjtyxyxb201504010
    [13]
    郭晓文.怎样保证仲裁员的独立性[G]//陈安.国际经济法论丛.北京: 法律出版社, 2001: 527-528
    [14]
    BRUNO G, CAIO D F.The CAS list of arbitrators: Lessons from the Pechstein case for Tokyo 2020[EB/OL].[2017-01-10].http://kluwerarbitrationblog.com/2017/01/06/booked-sports-arbitration/
    [15]
    杨良宜.国际商务仲裁[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社, 1996:168
    [16]
    董金鑫.《与体育相关的仲裁法典》的最新修订研究[G]//广州仲裁委员会.仲裁研究.北京: 法律出版社, 2015: 89
    [17]
    CHRISTIAN D, OLGA T.Seven steps to reforming the court of arbitration for sport[J].World Sports Law Report, 2015, 13(4):3 https://dspace.stir.ac.uk/bitstream/1893/23784/1/Dimeo-Conversation-2016.pdf
    [18]
    ANDREW V.The court of arbitration for sport:Law-making and the question of independence[M].Bern:Stämpfli Verlag, 2014:169
    [19]
    熊瑛子.论国际体育仲裁司法审查中的实体性公共秩序[J].体育科学, 2014, 34(12):87-88 http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tykx201412010
    [20]
    ANTOINE D.The Pechstein ruling of the Oberlandesgericht München-time for a new reform of CAS?[EB/OL].[2016-06-13].http://www.asser.nl/SportsLaw/Blog/post/the-pechstein-ruling-of-the-oberlandesgericht-munchen-time-for-a-new-reform-of-cas#_ftn16
    [21]
    CAS.Statement of the court of arbitration for sport (CAS) on the decision made by the German federal tribunal (Bundesgerichtshof) in the case between Claudia Pechstein and the international skating union (ISU), 7 June 2016[EB/OL].[2016-07-02].http://www.tas-cas.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Media_Release_Pechstein_07.06.16_English_.pdf
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHAO Yi, TAO Ran. Debating Issues and Legal Interpretation on the Scope of Acceptance of Sports Arbitration[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2024, 48(10): 49-61. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2024.05.26.0004
    [2]GUO Shuli, LIANG Xiaoying. Criticism on the Imperfect Practice of Provisional Measures in CAS AHD[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2023, 47(5): 15-24. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2022.11.23.0006
    [3]ZHOU Aiguang. Interpretation of the General Provisions of the Newly Revised Sports Law of the People's Republic of China from the Perspective of Legal Hermeneutics[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2023, 47(5): 1-14. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2022.08.12.0004
    [4]YUAN Gang, LI Shan. Legal Dogmatic Analysis on the Broadcast Rights of Sports Event Organizers as Data PropertyBased on the Civil Code and New Sports Law[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2022, 46(10): 23-32, 75. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2022.06.20.0001
    [5]HUANG Shichang, YAN Ziang. Problem and Optimization Path of Dispute Resolution Mechanisms of Chinese Professional Football Players[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2022, 46(2): 14-23. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2021.04.09.0007
    [6]GUO Shuli. Right or Privilege: Legal Nature of Competition Eligibility of Olympic Games: Comments on the Russian Athletes Arbitration Cases in Pyeongchang Winter Olympic Games[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2020, 44(1): 39-48. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2020.01.005
    [7]YANG Lei. The Legal Conflicts in Assessing the Validity of Mandatory Arbitration Clause in Sports: Implication for the Legislation of Sports Arbitration in China[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2019, 43(3): 27-32. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2019.03.005
    [8]YU Dawei. The Motivation and Inspiration of Sports Foreign Aid in China[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2019, 43(2): 49-54, 62. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2019.02.007
    [9]WANG Jixia, CHEN Yan. American Arbitration of Doping Disputes in Professional Sports[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2019, 43(2): 18-24. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2019.02.003
    [10]LIU Yun. Preliminary Construction of Arbitration for Sport in China——Based on the Arbitration Right of Athletes in CAS Arbitration System[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2017, 41(5): 49-56. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2017.05.008

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 雍丽明. 义务教育阶段学生体育素养测评体系构建与应用. 山东体育科技. 2025(01): 54-60 .
    2. 毕瑞月. 体育事业高质量发展背景下青少年体育素养培育路径探讨. 当代体育科技. 2024(12): 180-183+189 .
    3. 黄欣语，彭晓. 青少年体育参与的社会系统解构:互动逻辑、现实困境及纾解之策. 体育科技文献通报. 2024(12): 257-261+276 .
    4. 杜建军，张瑞林，车雯. 青少年体质健康促进的精细化治理：逻辑理路、动力转向与溢出图景. 西南大学学报(社会科学版). 2023(01): 193-204 .
    5. 李博，刘阳. 基于体育素养测评的儿童基本动作技能测试体系构建与验证研究. 体育科学. 2022(04): 31-42 .
    6. 丁力，胡小清. 信息技术对学生体育素养评价体系建构的推动作用研究. 沈阳体育学院学报. 2022(04): 29-35 .
    7. 柏丹，马瑞. 新时代背景下学校体育师资培养的再审视. 上海教育科研. 2021(11): 52-58 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (179) PDF downloads (11) Cited by(9)

    Copyright© Editorial Department of Journal of Shanghai University of Sport沪ICP备18025724号-1

    Address：Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, No. 650 Qingyuan Ring Road, Yangpu District, ShanghaiPostcode：200438

    Phone：021-65506286Email: xb@sus.edu.cn

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return