Abstract: In practice, regulations for the manipulation of sports competitions mainly depends on a single administrative supervision or criminal sanctions, but these two paths have externalities and ex post facto characteristics, resulting in an ineffective regulation. As a modern social governance mode, compliance has a positive significance on the regulations for the manipulation of sports competitions through its embedded cooperative regulation path, and the newly revised Sports Law of the People's Republic of China adds the legal obligations and responsibilities of sports organizations, so it is necessary to introduce the compliance system. The regulatory path of manipulating sports competition behaviors under the compliance includes self-regulation of sports organizations and external incentives of the government. The former is the essence, and the latter the drive. On the one hand, it is to strengthen the self-regulation of sports organizations to build a trinity self-regulation system of prevention, in-process supervision and post response; on the other hand, we should give full play to the incentive role of the state through administrative incentives, or push the effective development of sports organization self-regulation reversely by means of the implementation of criminal laws. Hence a dual subject cooperation regulation path of "sports organization-state" will be established, providing institutional guarantee for building a fair competition order.