中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》(CSA)收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

从强制阐释到中国式现代化:中国武术研究的理论窠臼与纾困方略

From Compulsory Interpretation to Chinese Modernization: Theoretical Patterns and Solutions to Chinese Martial Arts Research

  • 摘要: 近代以来,中国武术在东西文化冲突与融合的进程中以“照着讲”与“接着讲”的阐释模式开启了现代化之旅,这并非以“西方体育取代中国武术”,中国武术在照着与接着西方体育、自身传统“讲”的基础上,进行了一些可贵探索并取得一定的成果。研究发现,改革开放后,随着越来越多的西方理论学说被译介到中国,以西学阐释武术成为武术理论的生长动力。值得注意的是,奉西学为圭臬的研究倾向在一定程度上将“照着讲”与“接着讲”阐释成照搬西方的述而不作。中国式现代化的叙事逻辑打破了当下西学的理论窠臼,为中国武术“接着讲”(接着西方经验和中国实际)的阐释模式指明了方向。

     

    Abstract: Since modern times, Chinese martial arts have embarked on their own modernization journey through the process of cultural conflict and integration between the East and the West, using the interpretive models of "following suit" and "continuing to speak". It is not as we believe that "Western sports have replaced Chinese martial arts", but that Chinese martial arts have formed some valuable explorations and achievements based on following through on Western sports and their own traditions. It was found that after the reform and opening up, as more and more Western theoretical theories were translated and introduced into China, using "Western learning" to explain Chinese martial arts became the driving force for the growth of martial arts theory. However, it is worth noting that the thoughts of "Western learning" as the standard to follow its research tendency is considered to interpret the "following suit" and "continuing to speak" to a certain extent as copying the West without doing anything. As a matter of fact, the narrative logic of "Chinese modernization" breaks the theoretical pattern of "Western learning" and finds the cultural posture that should be possessed for the interpretation mode of "continuing to speak" (followed by Western experience and Chinese reality) of Chinese martial arts.

     

/

返回文章
返回