中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》(CSA)收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

《体育法》评注的编纂刍议与范式设想

Compilation and Paradigm Assumption of the Commentary to Sports Law

  • 摘要: 《中华人民共和国体育法》(以下简称《体育法》)作为我国体育法领域的基本法,其全面修订翻开了依法治体的新篇章,对我国体育法治建设产生重要作用。但本次修法尚存些许剩余问题,伴随体育改革深化,诸多规范概念、技术用语亟待解释。短时间内再次修法并不可行,有违立法逻辑、惯例。作为法教义学的集大成者,法律评注以现行法解释为中心,关注实定法实践功效,在《体育法》新修订背景下配套评注不应缺位。经由评注对《体育法》重要内容的整理、提炼能为理论与实务界搭建沟通桥梁,并可发挥通过法律评注的信息指引、规范释义、批判检验等功能消解体育法规范的适用困局,以更精准地理解、把握《体育法》修法思路与价值取向。

     

    Abstract: As a basic law in the field of sports law, the comprehensive revision of Sports Law of the People's Republic of China (referred to as Sports Law) opens a new chapter in the field of governing sports by law. At the same time, however, there are some problems to be left with the deepening of sports reform, including many normative concepts to be interpreted and technical concepts to be explained. And, it is not feasible to revise the law again in a short period of time, as it is against the legislative logic and practice. As a synthesis of dogmatics of law, legal commentary centers on the interpretation of existing laws and pays attention to their practical effects, therefore, the supporting commentaries should not be absent under the background of the new revision of Sports Law. Sorting out the important content and refining them through the commentaries of Sports Law, can bridge the theoretical and practical circles effectively. The functions of legal commentary, such as information guidance, normative interpretation and critical examination, can clear up the practical difficulties in the application of sports law norms, which will help to understand the thinking and value of the revision of Sports Law more accurately.

     

/

返回文章
返回