中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》(CSA)收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

妨害兴奋剂管理罪的法益确证及展开兼与李冠煜商榷

Legal Interest Confirmation and Its Development in the Crime of Obstructing Doping AdministrationAlso a Discussion with LI Guanyu

  • 摘要: 关于妨害兴奋剂管理罪保护的法益存在“法益一元论”与“法益二元论”,其中“法益二元论”又可以分为“一元法益说”与“多元法益说”。“法益一元论”与妨害兴奋剂管理罪的因果性不足,“多元法益说”则模糊了法益保护的内容,而从法益内涵、性质看,本罪保护的法益应是“一元法益说”中的体育竞技公平公正。在体育竞技公平公正法益内容的指涉下,妨害兴奋剂管理罪不属于抽象危险犯,而是实害犯,“情节严重”是对“引诱、教唆、欺骗”行为性质的规定,属于违法性要素,对其认定应发挥法益对构成要件的解释机能,重塑“情节严重”的内容。

     

    Abstract: The legal interest protection in the crime of obstructing doping management can be divided into "legal interest monism" and "legal interest dualism", among which "legal interest dualism" can be redivided into "unary legal interest theory" and "multiple legal interest theory". However, no sufficient casual effect exists between the "legal interest monism" and the crime of doping management; the "multiple legal interest" obscures the content of legal interest protection. From the connotation and nature of legal interest, the legal interest protection of this crime should be the fairness and justice of sports competition in the "unary legal interest theory". In the content of fair and just of sport, the crime of obstructing doping management does not belong to the offender of abstract danger, but a real harm; while the "circumstances are serious" is the provisions of the nature of "lure, abet, deception" behaviors, belonging to the illegal elements. Therefore, it is necessary to develop the interpretation function of legal elements and reshape the content of the "serious circumstances".

     

/

返回文章
返回