中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》(CSA)收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

跑鞋碳板结构设计对前掌跑落地冲击阶段足部力学响应特征的影响

Effects of Carbon-fiber Plate Design in Running Shoes on Foot Mechanics During Forefoot Impact

  • 摘要:
    目的 探究跑鞋碳板(carbon-fiber plate,CFP)结构设计对前足足底和足底筋膜力学响应的影响,为预防跑步时的足部损伤和跑鞋结构优化提供参考。
    方法 基于已搭建的足-鞋三维有限元模型,对比不同位置(鞋垫底部,HL;中底中部,ML;外底上部,LL)以及不同厚度(1 mm、2 mm、3 mm)的CFP结构设计对前掌跑(FFS)落地冲击阶段前足足底压力和足底筋膜应力、应变的影响。
    结果 当CFP厚度较小(1 mm)时,其嵌入位置对前足足底和足底筋膜力学响应特征的影响有所不同。与对照跑鞋(No CFP,NC)相比,HL和ML情况下足底压力峰值分别增加了3.84%和4.31%,而LL情况下近端足底筋膜的应力与应变峰值分别增加了2.67%和3.19%。随着CFP厚度增加至3 mm,足底压力、足底筋膜应力与应变均明显减小,其中:足底压力峰值以LL3(3 mm,LL)情况下降低最为明显,较NC降低了29.56%;足底筋膜应力与应变峰值也均明显低于NC,且3种位置CFP的效果基本一致。
    结论 当CFP厚度较小时,其嵌入位置的不同或将对足部组织力学产生相异的作用,但随着CFP厚度增加,足底压力、足底筋膜受力程度均明显减小,且嵌入LL的CFP整体效果更好。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the effect of different parametrical designs with carbon-fiber plate (CFP) structure in running shoes on the mechanical response of the forefoot and plantar fascia, so as to provide references for the prevention of running-related foot injuries and optimization of running shoes.
    Methods Based on the established 3D foot-shoe finite element model, changes of forefoot plantar pressure and stress and strain in plantar fascia were analyzed at the impact peak of forefoot strike (FFS) running when wearing shoes with different CFP designs, including three different locations (high-loaded, HL, just below the insole; mid-loaded, ML, in between the midsole; and low-loaded, LL, just above the outsole) and three thicknesses (1 mm, 2 mm, 3 mm).
    Results When the CFP thickness was small (1 mm), the effects of its embedded locations on the mechanical response of the forefoot and plantar fascia was different. Compared with the no-CFP shoe (NC), the peak plantar pressure in HL and ML situations increased by 3.84% and 4.31%, respectively, while the peak stress and strain values of the proximal plantar fascia in the LL situation increased by 2.67% and 3.19%, respectively. With the increase of CFP thickness (3 mm), the plantar pressure, plantar fascia stress, and strain all decreased greatly, with the peak plantar pressure decreasing the most in the LL3 (3 mm, LL) situation, which was 29.56% lower than NC. The peak plantar fascia stress and strain were also greatly lower than NC, and the effects of CFP at the three locations were basically the same.
    Conclusions When the CFP thickness is small, different embedded locations may have varying effects on foot mechanics. However, as the CFP thickness increases, plantar pressure and plantar fascia loading gradually decrease, and low-loaded CFP achieves better results.

     

/

返回文章
返回