中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》(CSA)收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

血流限制结合低负荷抗阻训练引发的中枢神经适应性反应来自近红外功能成像的证据

Central Neural Adaptative Response Induced by Blood Flow Restriction with Low-load Resistance TrainingEvidence from an fNIRS Study

  • 摘要:
    目的 使用近红外功能成像对不同加压强度下抗阻训练过程中大脑皮层的血氧活动进行监测,验证血流限制训练结合低负荷抗阻训练引发的大脑皮层适应性反应,探究训练效益产生的神经机制。
    方法 以24名男性大学生为实验对象,实验为4(加压强度:0 mmHg、150 mmHg、250 mmHg、350 mmHg)×3兴趣脑区:初级运动皮层(M1)、运动前区-辅助运动区(PMC-SMA)、背外侧前额叶(DLPFC)的双因素被试内设计,对血流限制结合30%1RM颈后深蹲训练中的大脑皮层含氧血红蛋白浓度(HbO)变异进行测量,同时使用主观疲劳量表和心率表监控内负荷。
    结果 ①相比无加压条件(0 mmHg),150 mmHg和250 mmHg加压强度下的皮层HbO水平更高,而350 mmHg加压强度下的HbO水平对比150 mmHg和250 mmHg出现大幅下降;②加压强度和兴趣脑区的交互作用显著,加压强度对于皮层HbO水平的调控在M1、PMC-SMA区域相比DPLFC更加明显;③加压条件下的平均心率显著大于无加压条件,但不同加压强度之间的平均心率不存在显著差异;④加压强度和评估阶段(前、后)在主观疲劳等级(RPE)上有显著交互作用,血流限制训练前的RPE无明显差异,训练后的RPE随加压强度增加同步上升;⑤深蹲1RM和血流限制训练中皮层HbO水平呈负相关,并且相关程度在M1、PMC-SMA区域较DLPFC更高;⑥深蹲1RM和250 mmHg加压强度下获得的大脑皮层激活增益不存在相关性。
    结论 血流限制训练能够引发中枢神经系统的适应性反应,中等强度的加压能够获得最佳的大脑皮层激活增益效果;M1、PMC-SMA在血流限制训练中发挥重要的主动调控作用;在有抗阻训练经验的人群中,最大力量素质不同的个体能够在血流限制训练中获得等量的大脑皮层激活增益效果。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective In order to verify the neural adaptation triggered by blood flow restriction training (BFRT) with low-load resistance training and explore the neural mechanisms, this study monitored the blood oxygen activity in the cerebral cortex via fNIRS under different compression pressures during BFRT.
    Methods Twenty-four males participated in a 4 (compression pressure: 0 mmHg, 150 mmHg, 250 mmHg, 350 mmHg)×3 regions of interest: primary motor cortex (M1), premotor cortex-supplementary motor area (PMC-SMA), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) within-subject design. Changes in cerebral cortex oxygenated hemoglobin concentration (HbO) during 30% 1RM squats with BFRT were measured, and subjective fatigue rating scale and heart rate monitor were used to evaluate internal exercise load.
    Results ① HbO were higher during 150 mmHg and 250 mmHg compared to 0 mmHg, but a significant decrease in HbO was observed during 350 mmHg. ② The interaction between compression pressure and regions of interest showed the regulation of cortical HbO by compression pressure was more pronounced in M1 and PMC-SMA. ③ The average heart rate under BFRT was higher than non-BFRT, but no significant difference in average heart rate under different compression pressures. ④ The interaction between compression pressure and evaluation stage (pre- and post-training) showed the rating of perceived exertion (RPE) increased with higher compression pressures only post-training. ⑤ There was a negative correlation between squat 1RM and HbO during BFRT, and the correlation was more pronounced in M1 and PMC-SMA. ⑥ Squat 1RM and neural benefit obtained at 250 mmHg showed no correlation.
    Conclusion BFRT can trigger adaptive responses in the central nervous system, and moderate compression pressure achieve the optimal neural benefits in terms of cortical activation. M1and PMC-SMA play important roles in regulation during BFRT. For people with resistance training experience, individuals with different maximum strength can obtain equal neural benefits from BFRT.

     

/

返回文章
返回