Problem and Optimization Path of Dispute Resolution Mechanisms of Chinese Professional Football Players
-
摘要:
职业足球运动员与俱乐部、足球协会等主体之间法律关系的特殊性，决定了此类体育纠纷解决机制的多样性。分析英国、德国足球运动员纠纷案例及其纠纷解决机制的特点，结合中国职业足球运动员在合同型和技术型纠纷等领域的实践，从纠纷性质、法律适用以及执行等方面进行探讨。认为：目前中国职业足球运动员纠纷解决机制缺乏独立体育仲裁机构与相应的监督和审查，内部仲裁、外部仲裁、调解与诉讼之间衔接不畅。基于中国职业足球现状和《体育法（修改草案）》，提出根据不同类型纠纷建立相应解决机制，并建立独立体育仲裁机构，完善程序衔接整合：①运动员与俱乐部的劳资纠纷，双方适用普通仲裁程序；②技术型和管理型纠纷由足球协会内部仲裁庭裁决；③运动员的纪律处罚以及不服内部仲裁的纠纷，在穷尽足球协会的内部救济后适用上诉仲裁程序；④运动员与赞助商的合同纠纷，在确定违约或侵权的合同责任后，可直接向法院提起诉讼或向独立体育仲裁机构提起普通仲裁。
Abstract:Because of the particularity of the legal relationships among professional football players, clubs and football associations, there are diversified resolution mechanisms for sports dispute. The classic dispute cases of football players in England, Germany and other countries and the characteristics of relevant resolution mechanisms are analyzed. Combined with the practice of professional football players' dispute resolution in the fields of labor disputes, internal punishment disputes and sponsorship contract disputes, the nature of disputes, application and implementation of laws are discussed. The result states there are some problems existing in the dispute resolution mechanism of professional football in China, such as the lack of independent sports arbitration institutions, accordingly the lack of corresponding supervision and inspection, as well as the lack of the correlation among internal arbitration, external arbitration, mediation and litigation. Based on the status quo of Chinese professional football and the revised draft of Sports Law, corresponding dispute resolution mechanism according to different types of disputes, establish an independent sports arbitration institution is proposed to establish, and improve the connection and integration of procedures. The common arbitration procedure should be applied to the labor disputes between players and clubs. The technical and management disputes in professional leagues should be decided by the internal arbitration tribunal of the Football Association.The appeal arbitration procedure should be applied to disputes involving the disciplinary punishment of players and those who do not accept the internal arbitration after exhausting the internal relief of the Football Association. In terms of contract disputes between players and the sponsors, after determining the contract disputes or infringement due to contract liability, it can file a lawsuit to the court or bring an ordinary arbitration to an independent sports arbitration institution.
-
[1] 新华社. 习近平主持召开中央全面深化改革领导小组第十次会议 李克强等出席[EB/OL]. [2020-12-27]. http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2015-02/27/content_2822649.htm [2] 赵毅.足球法: 论域与问题[J]. 广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2018,40(4):83-89 [3] GELB S I. FIFA's Goal: The role of FIFA in international football development[D]. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand, 2019: 6-7
[4] 董金鑫.我国足球劳动合同争议的司法处理[J]. 西安体育学院学报,2016,33(6):652-656, 665 [5] 杨桦.体育改革: 成就、问题与突破[J]. 体育科学,2019,39(1):5-11 [6] SCELLES N, PENG Q, VALENTI M. Do the peculiar economics of professional team sports apply to esports? Sequential snowballing literature reviews and implications[J]. Economies,2021,9(1):1-18
[7] 哈迪. 英国劳动法与劳资关系[M]. 陈融, 译. 北京: 商务印书馆, 2012: 91 [8] 多伊普勒. 德国劳动法[M]. 王倩, 译. 上海: 上海人民出版社, 2016: 13-14 [9] 郭树理. 体育纠纷的多元化救济机制探讨: 比较法与国际法的视野 [M]. 北京: 法律出版社, 2004: 125 [10] 郭树理.体育组织章程或规则中强制仲裁条款的法律效力辨析[J]. 武汉体育学院学报,2018,52(2):17-25, 48 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-520X.2018.02.003 [11] Statement of the CAS on the decision made by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in the case between Claudia Pechstein / Adrian Mutu and Switzerland[EB/OL]. [2020-12-27]. https://www.tas-cas.org/fr/medias/communications-aux-medias/article/statement-of-the-cas-on-the-decision-made-by-the-european-court-of-human-rights-echr-in-the-case-b.html
[12] 陆在春, 高升.我国职业体育劳资纠纷的法律规制研究[J]. 河南大学学报(社会科学版),2015,55(3):57-64 [13] 王家宏, 刘广飞, 赵毅, 等.中国体育深化改革相关法律问题研究[J]. 体育科学,2019,39(11):3-14 [14] 程善. “傅明尺度”经不住推敲 也带来连锁争议[N]. 足球, 2020-08-17（1） [15] 苟仲文. 新中国体育70年[N]. 中国体育报, 2019-09-24（1） [16] 王家宏, 蔡朋龙.全国性单项运动协会社团法人实体化改革趋向与推进的法治化路径研究[J]. 体育学研究,2019,2(6):1-14 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1909.2019.06.002 [17] 谭小勇.中国“体育仲裁”制度建设之中间道路:以建立统一而相对独立的内部仲裁制度为视角[J]. 西安体育学院学报,2016,33(6):657-665 [18] 刘韵.北京冬奥会背景下兴奋剂仲裁案件的程序正义进路:以运动员的基本人权为视角[J]. 中国体育科技,2018,54(3):22-28, 51 [19] CAS. Code of sports-related arbitration[EB/OL]. [2021-03-13]. https://www.tas-cas.org/fileadmin/user_upload/CAS_Code_2020__EN__-_modifications_visible.pdf
-
期刊类型引用(6)
1. 孙国平，王晗. 论CBA独家签约权制度——“周琦事件”引发的思考. 上海体育大学学报. 2024(06): 1-13 . 
本站查看
2. 陈冬伟，王凯珍，于焕军. 单项体育协会内部纠纷解决制度的实践检视与完善理路. 武汉体育学院学报. 2024(09): 33-40 . 百度学术
3. 班小辉，朱康军. 我国职业足球劳动争议解决机制的完善——基于新修《体育法》的考察. 湖湘法学评论. 2023(01): 123-132 . 百度学术
4. 梁婧，周青山. 国际转会纠纷中职业足球工作合同认定研究. 北京体育大学学报. 2023(12): 18-29 . 百度学术
5. 尚博文，陈源荣. 论法律价值目标下体育仲裁的演进逻辑与现实进路. 商事仲裁与调解. 2022(02): 53-68 . 百度学术
6. 辛松和. 中国职业运动员转会中经纪人的道德风险及其防范研究. 成都体育学院学报. 2022(04): 38-43+50 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(7)
计量
- 文章访问数: 200
- HTML全文浏览量: 315
- PDF下载量: 48
- 被引次数: 13
下载: