中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》(CSA)收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

吴铭,杨剑.青少年静坐行为前因机制建构与检验——基于探索性序列设计的混合研究[J].上海体育学院学报,2023,47(11):92-108. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2022.12.11.0003
引用本文: 吴铭,杨剑.青少年静坐行为前因机制建构与检验——基于探索性序列设计的混合研究[J].上海体育学院学报,2023,47(11):92-108. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2022.12.11.0003
WU Ming, YANG Jian. Model Test of Influencing Factors of Adolescent Sedentary Behavior: A Mixed Research to Exploratory Sequence Design[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2023, 47(11): 92-108. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2022.12.11.0003
Citation: WU Ming, YANG Jian. Model Test of Influencing Factors of Adolescent Sedentary Behavior: A Mixed Research to Exploratory Sequence Design[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2023, 47(11): 92-108. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2022.12.11.0003

青少年静坐行为前因机制建构与检验基于探索性序列设计的混合研究

Model Test of Influencing Factors of Adolescent Sedentary BehaviorA Mixed Research to Exploratory Sequence Design

  • 摘要: 采用探索性序列设计的混合研究方法,建构并检验青少年静坐行为前因作用机制模型。结果显示:①影响青少年静坐行为的因素包括个体、人际、组织、社区4个主范畴,各层面因素相互影响,共同作用于青少年静坐行为。②不同层面因素对青少年不同类型静坐时间影响不同:在个体层面,生活习惯对教育类、视频类静坐具有直接预测作用,自我控制对视频类静坐具有直接预测作用;在人际层面,朋友支持、家人支持、教师支持能够对教育类、交通类、社交类、视频类静坐时间产生直接或间接影响;在组织层面,家庭环境和学校环境能够对教育类、视频类静坐时间产生直接影响,也能够通过人际层面对教育类、交通类、社交类、视频类静坐时间产生间接影响;在社区层面,建成环境既能够直接影响交通类静坐时间,也能够通过组织层面和人际层面间接影响教育类、社交类、视频类静坐时间。③性别和学段在教育类、交通类、社交类、视频类静坐时间的前因作用机制模型上存在群组差异。

     

    Abstract: A model of the influencing factors of adolescent sedentary behavior are constructed and tested by a mixed research method. The result shows that (1) The influencing factors of adolescent sedentary behavior include four main categories: individual, interpersonal, organizational and community. (2) Different levels of influencing factors have different effects on different types of sedentary behaviors of adolescents: ① At the individual level, living habits have a direct predictive effect on education and screen sedentary, and self-control has a direct predictive effect on screen sedentary effect. ② At the interpersonal level, friend support, family support, and teacher support can directly or indirectly affect sedentary time in education, transportation, social, and screen. ③ At the organizational level, the family environment and school environment can have a direct impact on education or screen sedentary, and indirectly affect education, transportation, social, and screen sedentary through interpersonal level. ④ At the community level, the built environment can directly affect the sedentary time of transportation, and it can also indirectly affect the sedentary time of education, social, and screen through the organizational and interpersonal levels. (3) There are group differences in the influencing factors of sedentary behavior models of education, transportation, social, and screen for gender and school stage.

     

/

返回文章
返回