中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价（A刊）核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》（CSSCI）来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》（CSA）收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

张德胜, 李峰, 王子也. 体育解说评论的3种逻辑及其科学运用[J]. 上海体育学院学报 , 2017, 41(2): 15-20. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2017.02.003
引用本文: 张德胜, 李峰, 王子也. 体育解说评论的3种逻辑及其科学运用[J]. 上海体育学院学报 , 2017, 41(2): 15-20. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2017.02.003
shu
ZHANG Desheng, LI Feng, WANG Ziye. Three Kinds of Logic on Sport Interpretation & Commentary and Their Scientific Application[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2017, 41(2): 15-20. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2017.02.003
Citation: ZHANG Desheng, LI Feng, WANG Ziye. Three Kinds of Logic on Sport Interpretation & Commentary and Their Scientific Application[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2017, 41(2): 15-20. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2017.02.003
shu

体育解说评论的3种逻辑及其科学运用

Three Kinds of Logic on Sport Interpretation & Commentary and Their Scientific Application

    摘要
  • 摘要: 体育解说评论既是一种扩大的新闻报道，也是一种观赏服务。它应遵循审美谈论的3种逻辑方式——描述、解释和评价。解说员侧重描述，评论员侧重评价，解说员和评论员均可即兴解释。这3种逻辑方式并非一成不变，关键在于科学运用。

     

    Abstract: Sport interpretation & commentary is a kind of extended news coverage as well as a kind of appreciation service. It must follow three kinds of aesthetic logic: description, explanation, and commentary. A broadcaster focuses on the description of a sport event; while a commentator emphasizes the commentary. And both of them can improvise to interpret. The key lies in the scientific application of these three kinds of logic instead of keeping them stuck in a rut.

     

    • HTML全文
    • 参考文献(14)
    • 相关文章
    • 施引文献
  • 资源附件(0)

/

返回文章
返回