中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》(CSA)收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

蔺新茂. 体育比较研究中的可比性问题分析——基于“背景可比性”的拓展与认识[J]. 上海体育学院学报 , 2017, 41(3): 1-8. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2017.03.001
引用本文: 蔺新茂. 体育比较研究中的可比性问题分析——基于“背景可比性”的拓展与认识[J]. 上海体育学院学报 , 2017, 41(3): 1-8. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2017.03.001
LIN Xinmao. An Analysis of Comparability of Comparative Study of Sport-Based on the Understanding and Analysis of "the Background Comparability"[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2017, 41(3): 1-8. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2017.03.001
Citation: LIN Xinmao. An Analysis of Comparability of Comparative Study of Sport-Based on the Understanding and Analysis of "the Background Comparability"[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2017, 41(3): 1-8. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2017.03.001

体育比较研究中的可比性问题分析——基于“背景可比性”的拓展与认识

An Analysis of Comparability of Comparative Study of Sport-Based on the Understanding and Analysis of "the Background Comparability"

  • 摘要: 比较研究中的"可比性"不仅要求比较对象具有相似性或相关性,而且强调比较对象隐含的差异性或异质性,这是比较研究的本质特征和存在的逻辑基础。目前我国一些体育比较研究往往忽视对比较对象"可比性"的考察与分析,将研究仅停留在"简单比对"式的附会、借鉴或移植上,因而造成研究结论的偏差和悖谬。以"背景可比性"为例,对我国体育比较研究的部分成果和现象进行调研与分析,阐释体育比较研究中由于忽视"可比性"而出现的结论悖谬,以引起研究者的重视。

     

    Abstract: The comparability in comparative study field requires the similarities or correlation, as well as the differences or heterogeneity between the comparison objects, which is the essential characteristic and the logical foundation for the existence of comparable study.However, in the field of comparative sport research in China, quite a lot often neglect the investigation and analysis of "the comparability" between comparison objects, with the assumption, reference or transplant of the "simple comparison" instead, resulting in the deviation and paradox of the conclusion.This study, with "the background comparability" as a model, makes an insightful investigation and analysis into some of the results related to the comparative study of sport in our country, and expounds some paradoxes resulting from the ignorance of "comparability", for the purpose of the researchers'attention.

     

/

返回文章
返回