Abstract: The main points and arguments of the article "On physical education in education and education in physical education" are discussed in this paper and the following opinions are put forward: 1) The article mixed axiology with ontology by taking the "all-round development of human being" as the nature of education and physical education. 2) The arguments on the relationship between education and physical education in the article emphasized that physical education belongs to the field of education only from a narrow and static perspective, lacking in the longitudinal analysis on the dynamic development of the relationship between education and physical education in different historical periods. 3) The assertion of physical education returning to education in this article can't solve the fundamental problem of contradiction between learning and training. By reexamining the relationship between education and physical education, we suggest that the study of the relationship between education and physical education should be based on the theoretical basis and the objective reality, aiming to achieve the harmonious development of education and physical education.