中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》(CSA)收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

徐伟. 体育犯罪刑法边界:标准构建与实践策略[J]. 上海体育学院学报 , 2017, 41(5): 57-63. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2017.05.009
引用本文: 徐伟. 体育犯罪刑法边界:标准构建与实践策略[J]. 上海体育学院学报 , 2017, 41(5): 57-63. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2017.05.009
XU Wei. Boundary of Criminal Law for Sport Crime:Standard Construction and Practice Strategy[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2017, 41(5): 57-63. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2017.05.009
Citation: XU Wei. Boundary of Criminal Law for Sport Crime:Standard Construction and Practice Strategy[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2017, 41(5): 57-63. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2017.05.009

体育犯罪刑法边界:标准构建与实践策略

Boundary of Criminal Law for Sport Crime:Standard Construction and Practice Strategy

  • 摘要: 对4种典型类型的体育犯罪进行分析,认为刑法不得已原则的法理标准和情理标准在准确判定体育犯罪刑法边界问题上卓有成效。故意伤害是竞技体育伤害罪与非罪的分水岭;自服和骗服兴奋剂是合理区分自损行为和刑事伤害的标准;是否合法买卖、运输、制造兴奋剂是当否判定非法经营罪的基础;公职资格是"假球""黑哨"定性受贿罪的遵循标准;赌球发起的非法性是非法经营罪成立的实质依据,亦是裁量赌球个人投注无罪的前提。

     

    Abstract: The study analyzed 4 typical sport crimes, holding that the legal standard and emotion standard of necessity principle in criminal law could effectively determine the boundary of criminal law for sport.Intentional injury or not is the division between guilty and not-guilty in sport; and taking dope consciously or unconsciously can determine the self-injury or criminal injury.Thirdly, the legal trading, transporting or producing dope or not is the basis for the judgment of crime of illegal business operations; and the qualification of public employment or not is the criteria of taking bribes in "fake ball" or"black whistle".Lastly, gabling behavior of the originators is the basis for the judgment of illegal business operation crime, as well as the verdict presupposition of not-guilty for individual gambling.

     

/

返回文章
返回