中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》(CSA)收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

李博, 刘阳, 陈思同, 程杰. 我国学校体育研究中访谈法运用的问题探析[J]. 上海体育学院学报 , 2018, 42(1): 56-63. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2018.01.009
引用本文: 李博, 刘阳, 陈思同, 程杰. 我国学校体育研究中访谈法运用的问题探析[J]. 上海体育学院学报 , 2018, 42(1): 56-63. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2018.01.009
LI Bo, LIU Yang, CHEN Sitong, CHENG Jie. The Application of Interview in School Physical Education Research in China[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2018, 42(1): 56-63. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2018.01.009
Citation: LI Bo, LIU Yang, CHEN Sitong, CHENG Jie. The Application of Interview in School Physical Education Research in China[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2018, 42(1): 56-63. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2018.01.009

我国学校体育研究中访谈法运用的问题探析

The Application of Interview in School Physical Education Research in China

  • 摘要: 对近5年CSSCI收录的体育学期刊中学校体育论文运用访谈法的规范化问题进行探析,揭示存在的主要问题:①缺乏方法论层面上的整体设计,仅简单地描述研究方法,对访谈法的各要素未详细交待,数据分析处理方法(技术)较匮乏;②不同类型的访谈法存在滥用和误用的现象;③缺乏对访谈结果信度、效度的检验;④还未涉及方法运用的伦理问题。基于此,提出访谈法运用的一般流程,以提升我国体育科学研究中访谈法的运用质量。

     

    Abstract: The study analyzed the standardization of interview method used in the physical education academic papers in sports journals collected by the Chinese Social Science Index in the last five years.The results show that the practice of interview lacks the overall design on methodology level, with no detailed description of every element in the interview method.Second, there exists the abusing or misusing different types of interview methods, with a deficiency in the scientific data process.Further, the reliability and validity on the results of interviewing are inadequate.And lastly, the ethical issues on the application of the method have not been involved.The study provides the standard procedures of interview method for the purpose of promoting its application quality.

     

/

返回文章
返回