中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》(CSA)收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

张磊, 隋晓梅, 张洁, 张岩. 公共教育支出与中小学生体质健康动态发展追踪——基于面板数据的分析[J]. 上海体育学院学报 , 2019, 43(6): 39-47. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2019.06.006
引用本文: 张磊, 隋晓梅, 张洁, 张岩. 公共教育支出与中小学生体质健康动态发展追踪——基于面板数据的分析[J]. 上海体育学院学报 , 2019, 43(6): 39-47. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2019.06.006
ZHANG Lei, SUI Xiaomei, ZHANG Jie, ZHANG Yan. Dynamic Development of Public Education Expenditure and Primary and Secondary School Students' Physical Fitness: Based on Panel Data Analysis[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2019, 43(6): 39-47. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2019.06.006
Citation: ZHANG Lei, SUI Xiaomei, ZHANG Jie, ZHANG Yan. Dynamic Development of Public Education Expenditure and Primary and Secondary School Students' Physical Fitness: Based on Panel Data Analysis[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2019, 43(6): 39-47. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2019.06.006

公共教育支出与中小学生体质健康动态发展追踪——基于面板数据的分析

Dynamic Development of Public Education Expenditure and Primary and Secondary School Students' Physical Fitness: Based on Panel Data Analysis

  • 摘要: 选取国家统计局各省教育经费支出和人均GDP数据,以及教育部2000、2005、2010、2014年连续4个周期的中小学生体质健康数据,运用经典回归模型,研究经济发展背景下公共教育支出与学生体质健康动态发展的关系。结果显示:①政府公共教育支出可弥补经济水平落后地区学生体质健康水平的不足;②较高的公共教育支出能显著提升学生的体质健康水平;③由于政府公共教育支出水平与当前中国居民的普遍借贷约束,使得政策的最大受益者非低收入弱势群体。

     

    Abstract: This study conducted the analysis by making use of the data of "China Student Physique and Health Research Report" from 2000, 2005, 2010 and 2014, as well as the provincial education expenditure and per capita GDP data in various regions of our country.Employing the classical regression model, it explored the relationship between students' physical fitness, economics growth and public education expenditure.The study shows that the government's public education expenditure can make up for the lack of health level of students in the economically backward areas; and the relatively high level of expenditure on public education will significantly improve the student's physical fitness.Thirdly, the level of government public education expenditure and the general borrowing constraints of the current Chinese residents fail to make the low-income disadvantaged groups the biggest beneficiaries of the public policy.

     

/

返回文章
返回