中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》(CSA)收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

杨远波, 陈丛刊. “控制权”理论视角下政府与基层体育社会组织互动关系的创新[J]. 上海体育学院学报 , 2020, 44(8): 19-26, 77. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2020.08.003
引用本文: 杨远波, 陈丛刊. “控制权”理论视角下政府与基层体育社会组织互动关系的创新[J]. 上海体育学院学报 , 2020, 44(8): 19-26, 77. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2020.08.003
YANG Yuanbo, CHEN Congkan. Innovation of Interactive Relations Between Government and Grass-roots Sports Social Organizations Based on the View of "Control Rights" Theory[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2020, 44(8): 19-26, 77. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2020.08.003
Citation: YANG Yuanbo, CHEN Congkan. Innovation of Interactive Relations Between Government and Grass-roots Sports Social Organizations Based on the View of "Control Rights" Theory[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2020, 44(8): 19-26, 77. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2020.08.003

“控制权”理论视角下政府与基层体育社会组织互动关系的创新

Innovation of Interactive Relations Between Government and Grass-roots Sports Social Organizations Based on the View of "Control Rights" Theory

  • 摘要: 处理好政府与基层体育社会组织的关系是推动体育社会组织健康发展的基本前提。运用文献资料法等研究方法,以“控制权”理论为分析视角,阐释“控制权”理论包含的目标设定权、检查验收权和激励分配权等3个维度,指出政府与基层体育社会组织之间存在体制性痼疾、机制性弊端和政策性障碍等问题,并提出创新策略:突破高依附性瓶颈,从“运动型动员”到“分权化治理”;革除强行政化流弊,从“权威管理”到“调适性协商”;破解低自由度难题,从“层层加码”到“鼓劲撑腰”;形成上下合力,从“向上交差”到“协同联动”。

     

    Abstract: To handle well the relations between government and grass-roots sports social organizations is the basic prerequisite of improving sports social organizations' development.By using the method of literature review, this article elaborated the three dimensions of goal setting right, inspection right and incentive allocation right from the perspective of "Control Rights" Theory. It analyzed the dilemmas between government and grass-roots sports social organizations, including the institutional maladies, mechanism disadvantages and policing barriers, etc. And the innovation strategy have been put forward in four aspects:breaking through the bottlenecks of high dependency by from "campaign-style mobilization" to "decentralized governance"; overcoming the drawbacks of strong bureaucracy by from "authority management" to "adaptive negotiation"; solving the problems of low freedom by from "raising the quota at each level" to "supporting and encouragement"; and shaping the cohesive force by from "report to the leadership" to "collaborative linkage".

     

/

返回文章
返回