中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》(CSA)收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

胡向东. 体育单招考试实施第三方监督评估的体系架构与现实价值[J]. 上海体育学院学报 , 2020, 44(12): 35-42. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2020.12.004
引用本文: 胡向东. 体育单招考试实施第三方监督评估的体系架构与现实价值[J]. 上海体育学院学报 , 2020, 44(12): 35-42. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2020.12.004
HU Xiangdong. System Framework and Practical Value of the Third-Party Supervision and Evaluation in the Specific Admission Test for Physical Education in China[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2020, 44(12): 35-42. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2020.12.004
Citation: HU Xiangdong. System Framework and Practical Value of the Third-Party Supervision and Evaluation in the Specific Admission Test for Physical Education in China[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2020, 44(12): 35-42. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2020.12.004

体育单招考试实施第三方监督评估的体系架构与现实价值

System Framework and Practical Value of the Third-Party Supervision and Evaluation in the Specific Admission Test for Physical Education in China

  • 摘要: 相对普通高考而言,自1986年开始的体育单招考试组织难度大、专业性强、考试质量难以保障,社会关注度较高。为适应体育单招考试由各组考院校单独组织向全国统一组织考试形式的转变,引进第三方专业机构对体育单招考试实施监督和评估。根据体育单招考试特点,有针对性地建立体育单招考试质量管理监督评估标准体系,确立由5个一级指标(考前准备、报到检录、过程监控、成绩处理、考风考纪与考生救济)、若干二级指标及主要观测点组成的“3级34点”的评估体系,并予以量化,建立“评价—反馈—行动”机制。其价值与意义主要体现为:保障体育单招施测质量,维护高考公信力;开创公众监督和评估国家考试新机制,创新考试治理模式;构建“评价—反馈—行动”学习机制,带动国家考试管理机制改革。

     

    Abstract: Since the Specific Admission Test for Physical Education began in 1986, it has always been the focus of the public with its organizing difficulty, strong professional features and poor examination quality which may produce. The third party was thus introduced to supervise and evaluate the specific admission test to suit the change organized by priviouly from various individual colleges and universities to the current general examinations.The specialized quality supervison and evaluation standard system for the test, including 5 firstgrade indicators(that is, pre-test preparation, registration, process supervision, performance result, examination managemen and test-taker assistance), some second-grade indicators and sub-observation points "third-grade 34 points", was therefore established and quantified, so was the "evaluation-feedback-action" mechanism. The evaluation system has ensured the credibility of the test, innovate the test governance mode by developing public supervision and evaluation, and promote the reform in natoinal test management by the construction of "evaluation-feedback-action" learning mechanism.

     

/

返回文章
返回