中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》(CSA)收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

饶林峰. 新中国成立以来中国近代体育史研究的问题、范式与展望[J]. 上海体育学院学报 , 2021, 45(8): 27-40. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2021.08.004
引用本文: 饶林峰. 新中国成立以来中国近代体育史研究的问题、范式与展望[J]. 上海体育学院学报 , 2021, 45(8): 27-40. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2021.08.004
RAO Linfeng. Problem Consciousness, Paradigm Application and Future Prospects of the Research on Modern Chinese Sports History Since the Founding of People's Republic of China[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2021, 45(8): 27-40. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2021.08.004
Citation: RAO Linfeng. Problem Consciousness, Paradigm Application and Future Prospects of the Research on Modern Chinese Sports History Since the Founding of People's Republic of China[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2021, 45(8): 27-40. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2021.08.004

新中国成立以来中国近代体育史研究的问题、范式与展望

Problem Consciousness, Paradigm Application and Future Prospects of the Research on Modern Chinese Sports History Since the Founding of People's Republic of China

  • 摘要: 从研究问题和研究范式两方面考察新中国成立以来我国近代体育史研究状况。认为:从20世纪50年代至今,近代体育史研究的问题意识随社会环境变化而改变,关注的问题逐渐多样,体育文化问题是关注的焦点;运用的研究范式主要包括革命史范式、现代化范式、社会史范式等,虽然研究取得了显著成绩,但研究范式的运用也存在同质化、移植化等问题。针对存在的问题提出未来发展方向:强化研究的问题意识,加强自身理论范式建设,深化已有研究范式,恪守学术规范。

     

    Abstract: The research status of modern sports history in China since 1949 from the perspectives of problem consciousness and paradigm application is explored.The research believes that from the 1950s to the present, the problem consciousness of modern sports history research has changed along with the social environment, featured with various issues and the sports culture as the focus.The paradigms application involved are revolution history paradigm, modernization paradigm, social history paradigm, etc.Though with remarkable achievements, the research has such problems as homogeneity and transplantation, and so on. Hereby the future development direction of modern sports history research is put forward: enhancing the problem consciousness, strengthening the construction of its own theoretical paradigm, deepening the existing research paradigm, and abiding by the academic norms.

     

/

返回文章
返回