中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》(CSA)收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

田浩冬,黄丽,刘昊为,等.T2DM患者运动响应与肠道菌群代谢:关系探究与机制推断[J].上海体育学院学报,2023,47(4):24-38. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2022.07.08.0003
引用本文: 田浩冬,黄丽,刘昊为,等.T2DM患者运动响应与肠道菌群代谢:关系探究与机制推断[J].上海体育学院学报,2023,47(4):24-38. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2022.07.08.0003
TIAN Haodong, HUANG Li, LIU Haowei, LIU Shiqi, ZHANG Ren, XIANG Qiu, ZHANG Hao, WANG Peisong, PENG Li. Exercise Response and Gut Microbiota Metabolism in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Relationship Exploration and Mechanism Inference[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2023, 47(4): 24-38. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2022.07.08.0003
Citation: TIAN Haodong, HUANG Li, LIU Haowei, LIU Shiqi, ZHANG Ren, XIANG Qiu, ZHANG Hao, WANG Peisong, PENG Li. Exercise Response and Gut Microbiota Metabolism in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Relationship Exploration and Mechanism Inference[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2023, 47(4): 24-38. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2022.07.08.0003

T2DM患者运动响应与肠道菌群代谢:关系探究与机制推断

Exercise Response and Gut Microbiota Metabolism in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Relationship Exploration and Mechanism Inference

  • 摘要:
    目的 对比有无运动响应的T2DM患者肠道菌群及其相关粪代谢物特征,探究患者运动响应与肠道菌群代谢间的关系,推断其影响机制。
    方法 随机招募16名T2DM患者,采用自身前后对照实验设计,进行为期6周的高强度间歇运动干预。提前3周收集受试者HOMA-IR数据并计算典型误差,基于此将受试者分为运动响应组(R组,n=9)与运动不响应组(NR组,n=7),对比2组受试者的肠道菌群特征与粪代谢差异。
    结果 ①干预后R组α多样性出现升高,显著高于NR组。②R组菌群关系更复杂、稳定,其关系网络特征在干预后进一步增强。③2组优势菌群差异显著,R组主要包含克里斯滕森菌、青春双歧杆菌等,NR组主要包含韦荣氏球菌、大芬戈尔德菌等;组内的显著差异仅在R组中出现,主要包含瘤胃球菌、芽孢杆菌等。④R组优势菌群的关联代谢物主要包含花生四烯酸、正缬氨酸等;NR组优势菌群的关联代谢物主要包含L-谷氨酸、2-乙基乙酸等。
    结论 T2DM患者的运动响应与其肠道微生态联系密切。运动响应者肠道微生态更为稳定,包含更多与糖脂代谢、胰岛素代谢、肠道炎症改善正相关的优势菌群,这些菌群的丰度变化可能是运动响应的重要原因。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives To compare the gut microbiota and related fecal metabolites between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with and without exercise response, explore the relationship between exercise response and gut microbiota metabolism, and infer its influence mechanism.
    Methods Sixteen T2DM patients were randomly recruited and a self-control experiment was conducted with a 6-week high-intensity interval exercise intervention. HOMA-IR data was collected three weeks in advance and the typical error was calculated to divide the subjects into an exercise response group (R group, n=9) and a non-exercise response group (NR group, n=7), and the gut microbiota and fecal metabolites of the two groups were compared.
    Results ① After intervention, the α diversity of the R group increased and was significantly higher than that of the NR group. ② The microbial relationship of the R group was more complex and stable, and its network characteristics were further enhanced after intervention. ③ The dominant microbial populations differed significantly between the two groups, with the R group mainly including Christensenellaceae bacterium and Bifidobacterium adolescentic bacterium, and the NR group mainly including Veillonella bacterium and Finegoldiamagna bacterium. The significant differences within the groups were only observed in the R group, mainly including Ruminococcaceae bacterium and Clostridium bacterium. ④ The associated metabolites of the dominant microbial populations in the R group mainly included arachidonic acid and norvaline, while those in the NR group mainly included L-glutamine and 2-ethylhexanoic acid.
    Conclusions The exercise response of T2DM patients is closely related to their gut microbiota. The gut microbiota of exercise responders is more stable, containing more dominant microbial populations that are positively correlated with sugar and fat metabolism, insulin metabolism, and improvement of intestinal inflammation. The changes in the abundance of these microbial populations may be an important reason for exercise response.

     

/

返回文章
返回