Abstract: The discipline formation of philosophy of sport in major countries, its concept transformation and fusion as well as the disciplinary contributions to sport studies from the perspective of global intellectual history are summarized. It finds that these countries all completed the initial disciplinary construction of philosophy of sport between the late 1960s and the 1990s, and at the same time showed a gradually disciplinary fusion and migration. These researches laid the logical start for the study of sport and provided a pluralistic perspective and methodological horizon for the interpretation of the meaning in sport. It is concluded that in order to break through the current research bottleneck of the philosophy of sport, it is necessary to clarify the real value and role of the philosophy of sport in the construction of sport science based on the evolutionary genealogy of the global intellectual history, and to actively explore its own unique knowledge types and cores thus to realize the top-down and bottom-up "meta-praxeology", starting from the embodied cognitive paradigms such as bodily knowing, bodily cognition and emersiology, so that the "onion cross-discipline" dilemma for sport science, which has no core of disciplinary knowledge, will be avoided. On the basis above, with the new and real problems oriented, the knowledge cores of sport science, that is, training, coaching and competition, can be extended to other branches, which provides a strong support for the logic of the sport science itself.