中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》(CSA)收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

姚万勤,李灿.人机协同:体育赛事裁判模式的转型与建构[J].上海体育大学学报,2024,48(2):70-79. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2023.03.22.0001
引用本文: 姚万勤,李灿.人机协同:体育赛事裁判模式的转型与建构[J].上海体育大学学报,2024,48(2):70-79. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2023.03.22.0001
YAO Wanqin, LI Can. Human-machine Collaboration: Transformation and Construction of Sports Event Referee Mode[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2024, 48(2): 70-79. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2023.03.22.0001
Citation: YAO Wanqin, LI Can. Human-machine Collaboration: Transformation and Construction of Sports Event Referee Mode[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2024, 48(2): 70-79. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2023.03.22.0001

人机协同:体育赛事裁判模式的转型与建构

Human-machine Collaboration: Transformation and Construction of Sports Event Referee Mode

  • 摘要: 作为主流体育赛事裁判模式的机器辅助裁判模式,受限于对体育赛事流畅性的追求,在实现体育赛事裁判的价值方面产生以下困境:在事实层面动摇公正性价值;在机器运算过程中破坏公开性价值;在运动员权利保障方面损害公平性价值。基于人工智能的技术能力,在人机协同裁判模式下,体育赛事流畅性与裁判价值的矛盾可以得到化解。为建立人机协同裁判模式,建议:承认人工智能具有裁判资格,使其享有独立作出判罚的权力;改进算法决策的内在缺陷,抵御算法决策的外在干扰;通过区分事实性判罚与非事实性判罚,在事实性判罚中改变机器设备的辅助定位,构建类似于“两审终审暨审判监督制度”的人机协同裁判模式。

     

    Abstract: As the mainstream referee mode for sports events, the machine assisted referee mode, limited by the pursuit of smoothness in sports events, has caused the following problems in realizing the value of sports event referees: it has shaken the impartiality at the factual level; it has damaged the openness in the machine calculation; it has damaged the fairness in athlete rights. Based on the technological capabilities of artificial intelligence, the contradiction between smoothness and the value of sports referee can be resolved with the human-machine collaborative referee mode. To establish a human-machine collaborative referee mode, it is proposed that artificial intelligence should be recognized as having the qualification to make judgments and the power to make independent judgments. The inherent defects of algorithmic decision-making should be improved to resist external interference from algorithmic decision-making. It is necessary to distinguish between factual and non factual judgments, change the auxiliary positioning of machine equipment in factual judgments, and construct a human-machine collaborative judgment mode similar to the "two instance final trial and trial supervision system".

     

/

返回文章
返回