中文体育类核心期刊

中国人文社会科学期刊AMI综合评价(A刊)核心期刊

《中文社会科学引文索引》(CSSCI)来源期刊

美国《剑桥科学文摘》(CSA)收录期刊

中国高校百佳科技期刊

蒋亚斌,张伟国.从治理技术到技术治理:体育治理数字化转型中“技术悖论”的形成与消解[J].上海体育大学学报,2024,48(9):12-23. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2023.08.16.0002
引用本文: 蒋亚斌,张伟国.从治理技术到技术治理:体育治理数字化转型中“技术悖论”的形成与消解[J].上海体育大学学报,2024,48(9):12-23. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2023.08.16.0002
JIANG Yabin, ZHANG Weiguo. From Governance Technology to Technology Governance: Formation and Resolution of the "Technology Paradox" in the Digital Transformation of Sport Governance[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2024, 48(9): 12-23. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2023.08.16.0002
Citation: JIANG Yabin, ZHANG Weiguo. From Governance Technology to Technology Governance: Formation and Resolution of the "Technology Paradox" in the Digital Transformation of Sport Governance[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2024, 48(9): 12-23. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2023.08.16.0002

从治理技术到技术治理:体育治理数字化转型中“技术悖论”的形成与消解

From Governance Technology to Technology Governance: Formation and Resolution of the "Technology Paradox" in the Digital Transformation of Sport Governance

  • 摘要: 体育治理的数字化转型是数字技术与体育治理体系的系统性融合。不断推动体育治理的数字化转型对实现我国体育治理现代化意义重大,但在转型实践中的“技术悖论”阻碍着数字技术应然效能的发挥。在探讨体育治理数字化转型内涵的基础上发现,技术失效、权利失衡、治理失真和制度失灵是“技术悖论”的4种具体表现,而技术适配不足、理念转变滞后、制度革新缓慢、主体能力缺位是诱发“技术悖论”的主要原因。基于此,为推动体育治理范式转换、助力国家体育治理体系和治理能力现代化,提出:坚持场景化治理,科学推动数字技术的“适体化”改造;坚持以人民为中心,加快引领数字体育治理理念转变;坚持多元主体价值共创,稳步促进数字体育治理制度优化;坚持“人治”与“技治”相结合,不断强化数字体育治理主体能力培养。

     

    Abstract: The digital transformation of sport governance is the systematic integration of digital technology and sport governance. It is of great significance to promote the digital transformation of sport governance to realize its modernization, but the existence of "technology paradox" in the transformation practice hinders the performance of digital technology. Based on the connotation of digital transformation of sport governance, the four manifestations of the "technological paradox" in practice including technological failure, power imbalance, governance distortion and institutional failure are explored. And, insufficient technology adaptation, lagging conceptual change, slow system innovation, and lack of subject ability are the main reasons to induce the paradox. Suggestions are proposed as follows: to adhere to the scenario-based governance to promote its "adaptive" transformation of digital technology, to follow the people-centered concept to accelerate the concept transformation, to obey the multi-subject value co-creation to steadily promote the system optimization, and to combine the "human ruled" and "technology ruled" to strengthen the training of digital sport governance subject ability, which will promote the transformation of sport governance paradigm and better help provide theoretical referenc for the modernization of sport governance system and its governance ability.

     

/

返回文章
返回