Citation: | LIU Liang, ZHAO Xiaohui, XU Fengping. Modernization of Organizational Forms: The Proposition, Theoretical Explanation and Policy Consideration of the New "Whole Nation System" for Sport[J]. Journal of Shanghai University of Sport, 2023, 47(3): 59-68. DOI: 10.16099/j.sus.2022.01.10.0005 |
Taking "organizational modernization" as a strategic proposition for constructing a new "whole nation system" for sport, it is believed that, organization as a transmission mechanism between the top-level logic and the bottom-level logic of the reform, is the key point to overcome the difficulties of the structure of sports development and the loss in the system. Based on the classification of "the first beneficiaries of organizational activities", the institutionalized organizational entities in the field of sport are divided into five categories: administrative organizations, economic organizations, social organizations, public institutions and task-based organizations, and their attributes are analyzed as well. Focusing on the optimization of inter-organizational relations, the core issues of "organizational modernization" are concluded as follows: the dualism opposition thinking mode should be abandoned ideologically; the collaboration-based cooperative action should be surpassed in the governance practice; new interactive relationship should be formed in the principle of the rule of law. Regarding China's current economic and social development, the policy recommendations for advancing the "modernization of organizational forms" are put forward: ①to grasp the "historical window" and shape the strategic opportunities for reform with key nodes; ②to choose the "Chinese-style path" and emphasize the Party's leading role in reforms; ③to establish "task-based organizations" to enhance the systematic reform from the top-level design; ④to promote the "performance-based governance" to give play to the leverage effect of evaluation and performance accountability.
[1] |
钟秉枢. 新型举国体制:体育强国建设之保障[J]. 上海体育学院学报,2021,45(3):1-7 doi: 10.16099/j.sus.2021.03.001
|
[2] |
潘雁. 文化治理,关键在“治”[J]. 人民论坛,2018(30):136-137 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3381.2018.30.056
|
[3] |
刘亮,徐凤萍,任倩楠. 大历史观下我国体育体制的嬗变逻辑:核心议题与组织模式[J]. 武汉体育学院学报,2021,55(7):43-49 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-520X.2021.07.006
|
[4] |
韦鸿. 论社会理性及其形成[J]. 现代人类学,2014(3):21-27
|
[5] |
王向民. “没有政府的治理”:西方理论的适用性及其边界:以明清时期的南方社会组织及其公共服务为例[J]. 学术月刊,2014,46(6):138-150
|
[6] |
石旭雯,任尔昕. 论我国事业单位的法律地位[J]. 法治论丛(上海政法学院学报),2007,22(2):93-98
|
[7] |
张康之,李圣鑫. 论任务型组织管理的技术性策略[J]. 学习论坛,2008,24(11):43-47
|
[8] |
张康之. 任务型组织研究[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 2009: 2
|
[9] |
周军. 官僚制控制体系的失灵与变革:通过任务型组织的建构寻求出路[J]. 公共管理与政策评论,2015,4(3):21-28 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4026.2015.03.004
|
[10] |
张康之,李圣鑫. 任务型组织中的任务决定论[J]. 学习论坛,2007,23(3):34-37 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7608.2007.03.010
|
[11] |
张凤阳. 任务型组织的生存逻辑:以计划生育委员会为例[J]. 中国行政管理,2015(1):77-82 doi: 10.3782/j.issn.1006-0863.2015.01.14
|
[12] |
谢秋山,陈世香. 弥补而非打破官僚制:国家治理现代化背景下的任务型组织再认识[J]. 甘肃行政学院学报,2018(5):11-20,125 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-4997.2018.05.002
|
[13] |
张康之,程丹. 任务型组织的动态能力建构[J]. 中国行政管理,2008(1):39-42 doi: 10.3782/j.issn.1006-0863.2008.01.012
|
[14] |
张乾友. 变革社会中的服务型政府建设:任务型组织的途径[J]. 北京行政学院学报,2014(1):43-49 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7621.2014.01.008
|
[15] |
曾令发. 任务型组织的发展:从新公共管理到整体型治理[J]. 学海,2007(4):129-134 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9790.2007.04.023
|
[16] |
柳亦博,玛尔哈巴·肖开提. 论行动主义治理:一种新的集体行动进路[J]. 中国行政管理,2018(1):81-91 doi: 10.3782/j.issn.1006-0863.2018.01.13
|
[17] |
曹俊. 我国政府购买服务中契约责任失效问题研究[J]. 江苏社会科学,2017(5):124-130
|
[18] |
彭少峰. 依附式合作:政府与社会组织关系转型的新特征[J]. 社会主义研究,2017(5):112-118
|
[19] |
李汉卿. 协同治理理论探析[J]. 理论月刊,2014(1):138-142 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-0544.2014.01.032
|
[20] |
张康之. 论超越分工-协作的合作行动体系[J]. 中共福建省委党校学报,2019(3):4-12 doi: 10.15993/j.cnki.cn35-1198/c.2019.03.001
|
[21] |
朴贞子,柳亦博. 共在与共生:论社会治理中政府与社会组织的关系[J]. 天津行政学院学报,2016,18(4):12-18 doi: 10.16326/j.cnki.1008-7168.2016.04.002
|
[22] |
辛鸣. 制度论关于制度哲学的理论建构[M]. 北京: 人民出版社, 2005: 127
|
[23] |
杨欣. 论分类改革后事业单位的公法“回归”及制度设计[J]. 理论学刊,2012(6):89-94 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3909.2012.06.017
|
[24] |
杨沛龙. 代替行政:事业单位、社会组织与政府职能转变[J]. 桂海论丛,2010,26(6):105-109 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1494.2010.06.025
|
[25] |
卡波奇,凯莱曼,彭号阳,等. 关键节点研究:历史制度主义中的理论、叙事和反事实分析[J]. 国外理论动态,2017(2):14-28
|
[26] |
习近平. 中国共产党领导是中国特色社会主义最本质的特征[J]. 共产党员,2020(15):4-8
|
[27] |
周望. 从改革成功看中国治理的机制优势[N]. 北京日报, 2018-06-04(13)
|
[28] |
晨曦. 用什么托举起三大球(体坛观澜): 关于体育改革向纵深推进的思考之三[N]. 人民日报, 2014-01-08(14)
|
[29] |
张超. 风险控制与治理绩效:改革开放以来中国社会组织管理体制变迁的制度逻辑[J]. 浙江工商大学学报,2019(5):120-127 doi: 10.14134/j.cnki.cn33-1337/c.2019.05.011
|
[30] |
尚虎平. “结果导向”式政府绩效评估的前提性条件:突破我国政府绩效评估简单模仿窘境的路径[J]. 学海,2017(2):26-34 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9790.2017.02.003
|